Where mandates
meet reality

Torchbearer designs, delivers and verifies climate and social programmes in the environments that are hardest to reach — and reports outcomes institutions can put their name to.

A glacial river cutting through mountain valleys in northern Pakistan

Climate change reaches the least-resourced first — delivery decides who it reaches next

Read the method

Scroll down ▾

What we do

Design programmes that survive scrutiny

We build programme architecture around measurable targets rather than activity counts — scoped to the standards funders, regulators and boards already report against.

Deliver where delivery is hardest

Flood-exposed districts, under-served schools, communities sitting outside formal service networks. We work through local partners and go where the need is, not where the logistics are easy.

Verify what actually changed

Baseline, endline and an evidence trail that holds up to an auditor. If an outcome cannot be measured, we say so before a programme starts — not after it closes.

Alignment

The Sustainable
Development Goals

Every programme we design is tied to named SDG targets and to the national agendas our partners are already accountable to — the same indicators, the same language, the same standard of evidence.

06 Targets we deliver against

Target 6.2

Hygiene, with explicit attention to the needs of women and girls

Our indicator: proportion of participants with sustained access to safe menstrual products twelve months after intake.

Full alignment framework

Torchbearer
in the field

Images from our programmes and the communities that run them. Photography is representative; programme imagery is published only with consent.

Hold & drag

Glacial melt reshapes the valleys people farm

Programmes are run by the women who live in them

Water access is the first system to fail

Distribution is the easy half of the problem

Households outside the formal service network

Heat and water stress are now the same problem

Our method

Stage 01Scope

We start by establishing what is actually true. Who is affected, how many, and what has already been tried in the same district by someone else. Most failed programmes fail here — they are designed against an assumption rather than a baseline.

Scope closes with a written problem statement and an explicit list of what we will not be able to measure.

Stage 02Design

Programme architecture is written against named targets — SDG indicators and the national frameworks a partner already reports into — so that results arrive in a format the partner can use without translation.

Every design carries a safeguarding plan, a data-protection position and a stated cost per outcome before a single unit is procured.

Stage 03Deliver

Delivery runs through local organisations and locally recruited teams. This is a deliberate constraint, not a cost measure: programmes that depend on outside staff stop working the moment the outside staff leave.

Distribution alone is never the intervention. Product and education are delivered together, or the outcome does not hold.

Stage 04Measure

Baseline at intake, endline at a fixed interval, on the same instrument, with the same population. Where a control group is feasible, we use one. Where it is not, we say so in the reporting rather than implying a counterfactual we did not test.

Attrition is reported as a number, not absorbed into the result.

Stage 05Verify

The evidence trail is assembled so that a third party can reconstruct the result without speaking to us: raw instruments, method notes, exclusions, and the reasoning behind every adjustment.

This is the stage most implementers skip. It is the one that makes a result usable in a disclosure, an audit or a board paper.

Read the full framework